requestId:68499aae681024.25485810.
Warning on “Strengthening the State and Reversing the Invasion” – “Confucianism’s Invasion” Advocate
Author: Huang YusongBaocai Network Recommendation
Source: Author Authorized by Confucian Network Published
Original in “Strategic and Governance” Issue 1, 2017)
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou Puyue on Xinsi
Jesus June 23, 2017
Note:This article is a speech by the author on December 10, 2016 at the “Mission and Reconstruction” discussion of the first Yuwu Jin Academic Forum hosted by the Xiexide-Yuwu Jin Philosophy Development Foundation.
[Abstract] Now “reflection and enlightenment” has become a kind of academic fashion. However, the “reflection and enlightenment” of the post-modernism of the East and the “reflection and enlightenment” of some Chinese people come from two completely opposite value orientations: the former is to double the “reconstruction and enlightenment” that is, “human restraint”; while the latter is “strengthening the national pressure and inverting the inverted world”, and nationalism suppresses everything. Among them are thoughts of pre-modernism or fundamentalism, and there are also the extreme changes in the modern nature. These are the three different stands for “reflection and enlightenment”. In China, as a late-developing country, enlightenment is an unfinished business. As the “national expression of modern sexual apology”, China needs the enlightenment led by Confucianism. The initiation of Confucianism is not only a fantasy, but a historical fact; but it must be admitted that this initiation has not been completed, and there has even been a dangerous reversal. To this end, it is urgent to advocate “Confucianism’s inspiration of the doctrine”.
【Keywords】Reflection and enlightenment; strengthening the national pressure and inverting the turmoil; Confucianism and enlightenment; modernity; human restraint
[Note]
Over the years, “reflection on enlightenment” and even “criticizing enlightenment theory” have become a fashion in the academic world, and it is also a fashion in the Confucian world. But it must be pointed out that in fact, the “reflection and enlightenment” of Oriental people is not the same thing as the “reflection and enlightenment” of some Chinese people. It is not to say that it comes from two completely opposite value orientations: the former is to double the “reflection and enlightenment” in a thorough manner; while the latter is to “strengthening the national pressure and inverted enlightenment”. Tomorrow, the historical task of saving the nation has been completed. The real movement is to realize the “strong national dream”, that is, to build a strong country. Therefore, Li Zehou’s judgment on “salvation of national pressure and inspiration” needs to be revised urgently, that is, the pressure and inspiration of the nation is no longer “salvation of the nation”, but “increasing the nation”. Therefore, a trend of thought that must be highly alert: nationalism overwhelms everything. Under this sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial sacrificial In this regard, this article advocates “Confucianism invaded the doctrine” [①].
1. Three stages of “reflection and enlightenment”
Carefully observe and analyze the so-called “reflection and enlightenment” or “criticize modernity” trends so far, and do not 博官网 cannot see that they come from three different purposes, from three distinct positions: postmodernism; premodernism or fundamentalism; and an extreme and distorted form of modernism.
(I) The position of postmodernism: the inspiration of the impurity of the physical confinement of the depletion of the consolidation conviction
There is a very broad misunderstanding, thinking that the Oriental postmodernism is a reversal of the inspiration of modernity. In fact, the opposite of postmodernism is not to be said to be a deepening of modernity, that is, seeking to double the individualization, that is, truly “The promise of the Enlightenment” – “the emancipation of man” (the most basic energy of modernity initiation is personality, see below). When we look at the concepts of post-modernism, such as the interpretation of broad-mindedness, basicism, essentialism, and logical centralism, such as self-exile and self-edge, they are actually more profoundly fostering the individual’s restraint, that is, “human restraint”, which happens to be “the ideal of emancipation” and that is, the “ideal of emancipation” of the so-called “destiny”, rather than denying the energies of the energies.
So,As a postmodernist, Foucault (Michel) Foucault, while reflecting on the inspiration, is not to abandon the inspiration, but to seek a new and more thorough inspiration, that is, a more thorough individual energy, that is, “it is no longer a practical development aimed at seeking a broad-value situational structure, but to conclude something The historical assessment of the work, these things have guided us to construct ourselves and recognize ourselves as the subject we think, think and say”; this is “a historical-realistic examination, and that is, our own mission to be an unrestrained existence.” [②] Foucault emphasizes the unrestrained existence of the individual self as the subject, which happens to be the most basic energy of modern sexual initiation.
So, the demand is strictly divided into two different concepts of “initiation”: one is the existing “initiation” in the modernization process of France, the UK and Germany, and the other is the ordinary “initiation” itself. The former refers to the existing history of modernization, which does have some problems, so it should be reflected or even criticized; the latter refers to the most basic energy of modernity, namely, the restraint of humans and the restraint of individuals, which is actually held by the postmodernism. This is similar to the “dialektik der Aufklärung” mentioned by MaxHorkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno: On the one hand, the existing “dialektik der Aufklärung” href=”https://twhugdating.org/”>Baosheng Sweetheart NetworkThe concept of the sensation itself has included the germination of the visible development tomorrow”, “the cause of happiness itself has become the source of misfortune”[③]; but on the other hand, “the goal of criticism of the sensation of the sensation is to prepare a positive sensation concept so that it can be solved from the confusion of self-discipline”[④]. This “ultimate concept of inspiration” is an absolute opposite of modern sexual inspiration, even if it is a “new inspiration” [⑤].
In this question, Juergrn Habermas’s insights are worth noting. In his opinion, the problem of modernization so far is not due to the realization of modernity, but on the contrary, it is due to the failure to truly realize the promise of initiation and people have not received real restraint. This is indeed a deep insight. But Habermas’s view also has a mistake: he mistakenly believed that the problem of initiation and modernization so far was due to the “subjective paradigm” in the concept; therefore, in order to achieve the promise of initiation, we need to implement “the transformation of paradigm” (change of paradigm, transforms from the subjectivity paradigm to the “inter-subjectivity” (or translates the “subjectivity”) paradigm. This is the disadvantage of German philosophy: it is always a problem of real problems as conceptual problems. The fact is exactly the opposite: the “people” that are promised to be restrained is exactly the “subject” of the “individual” rather than the “interactive subject”. The real community theory is not the basic system of unrestrained society; what is actually needed is the social movement of “pre-subjective”, that is, the meaning of existence (Being theory), thereby promoting the life of real people or individuals. [⑥]
(II) The standpoint of the predecessor: the traditional “re-enchantment” of the divas
The accompanying “re-enchantment” and “re-enchantment” is the current trend of “re-enchantment” and “re-enchantment” that is today.
發佈留言